IRC 677


To build upon our previous discussions on foreign grantor trusts, today’s topic concerns Section 677 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). Specifically, this section of the IRC discusses a foreign trust’s grantor’s ability to receive income from the trust. This topic is essential for anyone who owns assets in foreign trusts and is moving to the U.S. or facing a liquidity event. Furthermore, this topic is also necessary for those who wish to take steps to avoid having their trust activate a grantor trust status. 

IRC 677

What is IRC Section 677? Simply put, any rev. rul under it states that a grantor of a trust shall be recognized and treated in the role of the owner of any portion of a trust with an income that is distributed towards the grantor or their spouse, held, or has been accumulated for future distribution towards the grantor or their spouse. This also will apply to the payment of life insurance policies on the life of the grantor or their spouse.

Income for Benefit of Grantor

The grantor shall be recognized and treated as the owner if the income from the trust is or may, at the grantor’s discretion (or a nonadverse party), be:

  • Accumulated for future distribution towards the grantor or their spouse;
  • Distributed to the grantor or their spouse; or
  • Applied towards the life insurance payment on the life of the grantor or their spouse.

IRC Section 677 – General Rule

This section of the Internal Revenue Code and all rev. rul provides that the grantor of a trust will be granted ownership and taxation upon any portion of the trust whose income is at the discretion of the grantor, their spouse, or any nonadverse person without the consent or approval of an adverse party, either:

  • Accumulated for future distribution towards the grantor or their spouse
  • Distributed to the grantor or towards the grantor’s spouse
  • Applied to pay premiums on life insurance policies for the grantor or their spouse
  • Applied or distributed in order to support or put towards maintenance of beneficiaries whom the grantor or their spouse is legally obligated to support or maintain

Definitions Relevant to Section 677

Various definitions relevant to this section of the code are basic yet essential to explain.

What is Income?

For the purposes of this subpart, under any rev. rul under Internal Revenue Code 677, income refers to taxable income (and not fiduciary accounting income), such as ordinary income or capital gains income. 

Who is a Spouse?

For the purposes of this subpart, a person is considered the spouse of a grantor solely during the period of the marriage to the grantor. Therefore, if the grantor and the spouse divorce, the grantor would cease to be taxed as the trust’s owner for income distributions or accumulations that benefit the former spouse.

Who is an Adverse Party?

For the purposes of this subpart, an adverse party can be defined as someone who holds a substantial beneficial interest in the trust and would be negatively affected by the exercise (or lack of exercise) of the power the person possesses concerning the trust.

Asena advisors. We protect Wealth.

What is a Grantor Trust?

According to the IRS, grantor trust status is activated when the grantor retains control over the trust’s income and assets. 

What Grantor Trusts Are Used For

There are various reasons for an individual to set up a grantor trust, but the five most common reasons are: 

  • Asset protection and wealth preservation;
  • Credit protection;
  • Avoiding probate;
  • Reduce or eliminate estate taxes and gift tax; and 
  • To gain any possible tax benefits or tax deferral benefits.

Who is the Grantor?

Also known as the owner, settlor, or trustor, it is a general rule that this person contributes property (such as real estate or estate planning), other funds, or even a trust instrument such as life insurance to the trust. According to the grantor trust reg, the property and the grantor’s funds become part of the trust corpus (in other words, the trust assets). It is crucial to note that a trust can have more than one grantor. If more than one taxpayer had funded a grantor trust, they will each be treated as a grantor in proportion to the cash or property’s value they transferred to the trust, according to the terms of the trust. 

The grantor is someone who retains the power to direct or control the trust’s income or assets, including estate planning under the trust. This is crucial to understand, especially when dealing with a foreign trust and the income tax treatment surrounding this trust instrument. Pulling from one of our previous articles, the grantor can also be any taxpayer who creates a trust and either directly or indirectly contributes a gratuitous transfer of property towards a trust. If someone creates or funds a trust on behalf of another, they are treated as the trust’s grantors. 

Income for Benefit of Grantor

The grantor shall be treated as owner if the income from their trust is or may, at the discretion of the grantor, be:

  • Distributed towards the grantor or to the grantor’s spouse, not in a fiduciary manner;
  • Accumulated for future distribution towards the grantor or their spouse; or
  • Applied towards the insurance policies’ payment on the life of the grantor or their spouse.
Constructive Distribution

Under Section 677, the grantor shall be recognized and treated in the role of the owner of any portion of a trust if they retain interest. And, without the approval/consent of an adverse party, the grantor can be enabled to have their income from the portion of the trust distributed to themselves at some time, either actually or constructively. The grantor shall also be treated as the owner if they have granted or retained any interest which might be distributed to the spouse (whether actually or constructively). Again, this action can be done without the approval or consent of an adverse party to enable their spouse to have the income from the portion at any time, even if it is not within the grantor’s lifetime. In this case, constructive distribution includes payment on behalf of the grantor or their spouse to another in obedience to their direction and payment of premiums upon life insurance policies on the grantor’s life or their spouse’s life.

Discharge of Legal Obligation of Grantor or His Spouse

The grantor shall be recognized and treated as owner of the trust if that trust income is or able to be applied towards the discharge of a legal obligation belonging to the grantor or the grantor’s spouse.  

Exception for Certain Discretionary Rights Affecting Income

A grantor should not be recognized or treated as the owner of a trust when a discretionary right can only impact the income’s beneficial enjoyment of a trust that is received after a period of time during which the grantor would not be recognized or treated as an owner if the power were a reversionary interest. 

Accumulation of Income

The grantor shall be recognized and treated as owner of a trust if any income has been accumulated for future distribution towards the grantor or their spouse without the consent of an adverse party. The grantor will be taxed in the current year, even if they must wait for an extended amount before accessing the accumulated income. Suppose that income is accumulated as a tax liability for future distribution towards the grantor or their spouse during any taxable year. In that case, the grantor shall be considered the owner for that taxable year.

Income Distributed to or on Behalf of the Grantor or Grantor’s Spouse

Section 677 applies when the grantor or their spouse is entitled to or can demand trust income. Further, it also applies when a nonadverse trustee has the discretion to distribute trust income to either the grantor or their spouse without the consent of an adverse party. Therefore, even the mere possibility that the grantor or their spouse will receive income is sufficient to trigger the application of Section 677. For income tax purposes, the grantor shall be taxed on all income that could be distributed, even if it is not distributed. 

Income Accumulated for Future Distribution to Grantor or Grantor’s Spouse

According to the grantor trust reg, a grantor is recognized and treated as owner of a trust whose income is or may be at the discretion of the grantor, their spouse, or a nonadverse party, currently accumulated for future distribution towards the grantor or their spouse, even without an adverse party’s consent. Therefore, this income would be taxable to the grantor in this scenario. 

Deferred Right to Distribution or Accumulations

Section 677 does not result in a grantor being taxed on a trust’s income when a discretionary power to apply the income of the trust for the grantor or their spouse’s benefit may occur only after a period of time that would not cause the grantor to be treated as an owner if the discretionary power were what is called a reversionary interest. 

Income Applied to Pay Premiums on Life Insurance Policies on the Life of the Grantor or Grantor’s Spouse

For income tax purposes, the grantor is taxed on any taxable income (and not fiduciary income) used to pay premiums on life insurance policies on the life of the grantor or their spouse. 

Income Applied or Distributed in Satisfaction of the Grantor’s or Grantor’s Spouse’s Legal

For possible income tax purposes, the income of a trust is not taxable to the grantor merely because trust income may be distributed or applied for the support or maintenance of a trust beneficiary whom the grantor or their spouse is legally obligated to support or maintain. The discretion of another person or the grantor acting as trustee must be applied in this scenario.

Obligation of Support for a Trust Beneficiary

With the statement above, however, any trust income distributed or used to satisfy the grantor’s or their spouse’s legal obligation of support for beneficiaries will cause the grantor to be taxed on such income. 

Divestiture of Powers Triggering Section 677

Suppose the grantor and/or their spouse have any interest in a trust that triggers the grantor trust status. In that case, they may be able to evade the application of Section 677 if they divest themselves of every interest that could cause the grantor to be taxed under Section 677. 

Taxable Portion Under Section 677

A grantor with only an income interest in the trust is taxed on ordinary items of income, and a grantor with only an interest in the trust’s principal is taxed on capital gains items.

Estate, Gift, and Generation Skipping Transfer Tax Implications of Section 677

The three most common transfer taxes under this section of the code (gift tax, estate tax, and generation skipping tax) under IRC 677 usually depend on the existing status of a person involved with the trust. For instance, the federal estate tax can be applied to the transfer of property or other kinds of items of income upon or following death. The gift tax also applies to transfers made only if a person is still living. Additionally, the generation skipping transfer tax is a supplemental tax on a transfer of a trust property or other items of income that skips a generation. However, intention and power under this section of the code over that transfer may impact if one of these taxes is imposed for your case. For example, a gift tax can only be imposed if complete dominion, including interest, over the gift, as the gift will be recognized as a trust property, thus triggering the gift tax.

How is an Irrevocable Grantor Trust Taxed?

An irrevocable trust can trigger grantor trust status if the trust fulfills any one of the following requirements as set out in Internal Revenue Code § 673-679:

  • The Grantor Maintains A Reversionary Interest
    • If a grantor holds a ‘reversionary interest’ within a trust greater than 5% of the trust income or principal, the trust may trigger the grantor trust status in terms of IRC § 673m.
  • The Grantor Has The Power To Control Beneficial Enjoyment
    • If a grantor can control the ‘beneficial enjoyment’ of trust assets or income, the trust may trigger the grantor trust status in terms of IRC § 674.
  • The Grantor Maintains Administrative Control
    • If the grantor can maintain administrative control over their trust that is able to be exercised for their own benefit, the trust may trigger the grantor trust status in IRC § 675.
  • The Grantor Maintains Revocation Powers
    • If the trust allows the grantor to revoke any portion of the trust, followed by reclaiming or taking back the trust assets, the trust may trigger the grantor trust status in terms of IRC § 676.
  • The Trust Distributes Income To The Grantor
    • If the trust distributes any income towards the grantor, the trust can, in terms of IRC § 677(a), trigger the grantor trust status.

Asena Advisors focuses on strategic advice that sets us apart from most wealth management businesses. We protect wealth.

Is an ILIT a Grantor Trust?

An ILIT, also known at length as an irrevocable life insurance trust, is an optional irrevocable trust that contains provisions designed to facilitate the ownership over one or more life insurance policies. In other words, an ILIT is a trust designed primarily to hold life insurance. Because it is irrevocable, the grantor cannot change or terminate it. It is important to note that in this scenario, the ILIT is both the owner and beneficiary of the life insurance policy and that it insures the grantor’s life. But to answer the question in this section, an ILIT is not necessarily a grantor trust. For a trust to trigger grantor trust status, specific provisions or powers that can lead the grantor of the trust to be recognized and treated as the owner over the trust’s assets under reg have to be in place. An ILIT is also subject under Grantor Trust Rule §677(a)(3) if the income of the trust may be applied towards the premium payments on policies that insure the grantor’s life (or the grantor’s spouse’s life). Again, for income tax purposes, the grantor will need to report all income of the ILIT towards the grantor’s income tax return. That way, the ILIT will use the grantor’s Social Security number as its primary tax identification number. This grantor trust option is usually referred to as an Intentionally Defective Grantor Trust (IDGT”).

What Makes an Insurance Trust a Grantor Trust?

The grantor will be treated as the trust’s owner if its income is, or in the owner’s direction, distributed to the owner or the grantor’s spouse. It will also accumulate for any future distribution to the grantor or their spouse or to be applied to payment of insurance policies on either the life of the grantor or their spouse.

Can a Non-Grantor Trust Own Life Insurance?

Yes, for instance, through private placement life insurance or PPLI. PPLI provides the ability for a foreign non-grantor trust to make investments into assets deemed to generate U.S.-sourced income and avoid U.S. taxation to the non-grantor trust.

An increasingly utilized technique to either eliminate or reduce U.S. income taxation towards U.S.-sourced income-generating assets to the foreign non-grantor trust is all for the trust to be making those investments inside a U.S. tax-compliant PPLI contract.

Inside a PPLI transaction, the insurance company will become the underlying beneficial owner over the assets in exchange for a policy whose value is tied to the asset’s value as held by the insurance company. Therefore, the trust would have ownership over a U.S. tax-compliant life insurance policy that includes a tax deferral on the build-up of cash value. It will not own the income tax-generating U.S.-sourced income assets, as those assets would be considered to be owned by the insurance company.

If the U.S.-sourced income-generating assets are held until the insured’s death within a PPLI policy, the death benefit is tax-free by the trust. In effect, having the U.S.-sourced income-generating assets that are held along with the policy should permit all the growth within the assets to escape U.S. income taxation while also being held and then sold at the insured’s death as they are changed into a death benefit.

However, once the current taxable year’s distribution exceeds the trust’s distributable net income, it is treated under reg as being paid from prior years’ undistributed income (also known as an accumulation distribution). This throwback to an accumulated distribution is taxed at the highest income tax rate that would have been applied if the income had been distributed to the beneficiaries in the year it was received. To make matters worse, any accumulated long-term capital gain loses its favorable character and is taxed at the higher ordinary income tax rate for a higher total tax liability. Further, the beneficiaries are also subject to a non-deductible interest charge on the accumulation distribution based on how long the trust retained it.

 

Speak with one of our specialists to learn more about IRC 677 and how it can help your case.

Arin Vahanian

Peter Harper

International Estate Planning

A short time ago, we had touched on the common pitfalls and necessary strategies a high-ultra networth individual residing in the United States would need to know when starting or in the middle of the U.S. estate planning process. Continuing onto that, we will be expanding the topic on a global scale and all the rules on taxation, residency, and succession that come with it.

International Estate Planning

International estate planning (or IEP) is a set of strategies and tactics applied to the U.S. and foreign clients to obtain the following objectives:

The first and most important objective is maintaining control and ownership of all wealth and property that the client has acquired in life and will be given upon their death. To determine said ownership and control, there are a few key factors to consider, such as:

  • The true domicile of the client and their beneficiaries;
  • The nature of the ownership rights of the client, their beneficiaries, and any political entities within which the property resides;
  • The tax jurisdiction between states based on local and international tax treaties to ensure efficiency when considering transfer taxes;
  • Transfers of control and ownership through trusts, contracts, and probate.

Another crucial objective is to the ability to provide absolute financial security for the client and their descendants that will last for multiple generations. As cash flow is an important way to leverage the behavior of family members, it is imperative to project the cash flow from the current assets and estimate the costs of winding up the estate. Financial security should also be ensured when the client is unwilling or unable to remain competent, as this can result in property, investments, and other financial assets to either be seized, lose monetary value, or be lost due to mishandling.

When is International Estate Planning Triggered?

There are several ways for international estate planning to be triggered when a U.S./Foreign client (with assets in the U.S.) either:

  • Accumulates or transfers a significant amount of wealth during their lifetime;
  • Probates, owns, or divides a significant amount of property (it should be noted that due to ‘FATCA’ and other reporting requirements, any amount above $100,000.00 is now considered “significant”).

Reporting and Confidentiality

Financial security is not the only concern for IEP clients when it comes to efficient tax planning. The confidentiality of their personal tax and account information may rank higher on the list of importance, as international estate planning will require much financial accuracy and scrutiny in order to complete the process efficiently. 

Unfortunately, with the implementation of the OECS’s CRS framework and the U.S. FATCA legislation, reporting on the client’s financial and tax information is no longer optional. It is mandatory for all tax history and current finances to be present not only at the beginning of inheriting or purchasing an international estate but throughout the entire operation in the case of changes or situations that could arise. It is critical to know precisely the kind of information the client needs to disclose in the various jurisdictions and the consequences of non-compliance in order to avoid the latter.

Who Does International Estate Planning Affect?

There are two specific client groups that are most often affected by international estate planning within the U.S.:

  • Any U.S. citizen or non-resident aliens living in the U.S. who own assets or have family members residing outside of the USA;
  • Non-US resident individuals who own interest in property located within the U.S. 

These two groups of clients share having a connection, whether familial or business-related, to the U.S. For those looking into other countries, it is vital to research the laws, tax treaties, and such that their specific country requires for international estate planning. For example, some countries, such as Britain, may impose a global inheritance tax on beneficiaries for estates that meet or exceed a specific monetary value, while others, like Portugal, do not.

International Estate Planning: Five Key Issues to Consider

It is of utmost importance for global families (especially families with U.S. expats) to create an international estate plan which considers the succession, domicile, generation-skipping transfer, succession, and gift tax laws in each jurisdiction where distributions may occur and/or assets are held at the time of the client’s death.

The U.S. imposes gift and estate taxes based on citizenship and domicile, which is more common in other countries, making planning for the U.S. expat particularly complex. To avoid the negative implications and consequences when the multi-jurisdictional estate plan is drawn up, the five factors below need to be considered for U.S. expats, green card holders, and/or other U.S.-connected persons.

Review The Basics of U.S. Estate and Gift Tax Law

The U.S. government imposes income and estate/gift taxes primarily based on citizenship. The maximum rate at which federal estate and gift taxes may be levied is 40%. There are tax exemptions and credits that Treasury amends on an annual basis, which typically excludes many U.S. citizens – due to this, many U.S. citizens are not concerned with estate tax planning.

Non-resident aliens may face estate tax on U.S. situs property (including shares and real estate in companies established or expanded into the United States). If the country in which the non-resident alien resides has an estate tax treaty, the jurisdiction where they are resident may have favored gift tax and estate treatment. If there is no estate tax treaty, there may be a cap on the tax exemption on their U.S. situs assets.

For individuals with a joint asset can bypass probate, with married holders adding 50% in value to their asset in the instance that one passes away. For more information, please read our article on issues to consider with joint assets to consider when doing international estate planning.

Understand the Jurisdiction in which The Decedent and Assets Are Situated

The United States offers generous gift tax and estate exemptions for U.S. citizens. However, other countries may have lower thresholds. A simple domestic estate plan may not address the complex issues which may arise if the client has assets in multiple jurisdictions.

The most significant difference is that of inheritance tax rules versus estate tax rules. Inheritance tax is typically paid by the person receiving the asset, while the estate pays estate tax. 

Succession laws also differ globally as many civil law countries in Europe, South America, and Asia have restrictions on who may receive assets at death – this is called forced heirship. The E.U. Succession Regulation (EU650/2012) alleviated some aspects of forced heirship. However, individuals may not assume they can proceed assets to any individual they want when residing within a civil law country.

Pay Attention to Nationality, Residency, Domicile, and Situs Rules

If multi-jurisdictional assets are considered, residency, nationality, and domiciled issues must be closely considered and understood. 

The estate tax for U.S. immigrants is imposed based on domicile. For estate tax purposes, a person is domiciled in the U.S. if they live within the U.S. and have no present intention of leaving. A Green Card may be a key indicator of their choice to remain in the U.S. and establish a domicile.

Other countries have codified requirements of when someone is resident and/or domiciled. European countries focus on how many days have been spent in the country when determining when worldwide assets will be subject to their local tax law. Multiple countries may consider the individual a domiciliary and/or subject certain assets to estate and gift taxes. In this instance, the special tie-breaker clauses in the tax treaties would need to be considered to avoid double taxation and determine legal domicile.

How certain types of property will transfer is subject to situs rules. Situs refers to a property’s physical location for legal purposes. The general guidelines for assets typically forming part of situs assets for non-resident aliens include:

    • Real Property (Structures, Land, Fixtures, and renovations/improvements located in the U.S.);
    • Tangible Personal Property (property physically in the U.S., including physical currency);
    • Intangible Personal Property (depends on the nature and character of the investment);
    • Business Investment Funds (funds used in connection with a U.S. business or trade and then held in a brokerage or bank account – this includes the U.S. branches of foreign banks);
    • Personal Investment Funds (Checking/Saving accounts; qualified retirement plans; stock; bonds; life insurance, and annuities).

Asena advisors. We protect Wealth.

Check Relevant U.S. Estate Tax Treaties

Bilateral estate and gift tax treaties provide clarity on international transfer taxes. The U.S. has signed estate/gift tax treaties with sixteen foreign countries, with each treaty altering the rules regarding the applications of the estate and gift taxes between the two countries.

The content and protections afforded in each treaty may be vastly different while also providing a framework to determine the situs of the property, the domicile of the decedents, and the application of the relevant tax credits in order to avoid double taxation.

The benefit of the tax treaties for non-U.S. citizens is to alleviate the estate tax on U.S. situs assets, thus saving money while still preserving the value of the estate.

Regularly Update an International Estate Plan

Reviewing and updating a draft in estate planning is vital when acquiring assets in different jurisdictions or moving across borders. Structuring an estate plan in a single country may create unforeseen and undesirable consequences when the estate is being executed in another country. Reviewing the domicile and residency of someone at the time of their death is crucial for the functionality of the estate plan.

Individuals can cement the fulfillment of their wishes after their passing by approaching legal counsel to adopt a Last Will and Testament, which meets the requirements of the United States and any other foreign country to facilitate the distribution of their estate.

Reviewing any trusts that the individual may have is as important as executing a professional international Will. When trustees and settlors of trusts move between jurisdictions, it is imperative to be examining the treatment of trusts in the new jurisdiction for new requirements that will call for financial redocumentation or applying for a form, service, or taxation status.

Some countries, such as the U.K. and New Zealand, may impose entry and exit tax on trust assets, while others (mostly European countries) do not recognize trusts due to their definition and structure of laws surrounding inheritance (common law vs. civic law).

However, it is possible for trusts to be moved internationally, though it would have to be done without the full knowledge of foreign financial and tax laws. In some cases, this can be done unknowingly by actions of a trustee or a settlor, and this may create unforeseen consequences. Trustees or settlors of trusts are advised to seek specialist tax advice before relocating to a new country to accommodate the changes in their international estate plan.

Cross Border Issues That Amplify The Complexity of Estate Tax Planning

As with any transglobal purchase, any expat looking to purchase property in another country must be aware of the following issues that appear often:

U.S. Estate Tax Basics

U.S. transfer taxes can be applied to a U.S. citizen no matter where they are residing, the location of gifts property, or if they have died. U.S. expats are entitled to benefit from income tax relief in the form of foreign-earned income exclusion since there is no such benefit where transfer taxes are concerned.

U.S. expats should expect The United States Treasury to impose estate tax upon their worldwide assets at the moment of their death. These assets will include proceeds from personal property, retirement assets, life insurance policies, real estate, and other assets. 

Treasury may also levy an estate tax on certain assets which may have been transferred to others within a specified period before the time of the individual passing or in the case where the decedent/beneficiary retains an interest in the property after the death of the cedent.

Changes to the recent estate tax law have increased the threshold for federal estate and gift tax lifetime exclusion to very high thresholds. During the 2022 financial year, the exclusions are as follows:

    • $12.06M personal lifetime exemption;
    • Interspousal transfers: transfers between spouses are unlimited (during the lifetime of the spouses or after death as long as the transfer happens to a citizen spouse);
    • The unused portion of the exemption from the first dying spouse’s estate can be carried over to the estate of the last surviving spouse. This will, therefore, increase the threshold for the last surviving spouse’s estate as long as an election is made on the first dying spouse’s estate tax return.

Should a U.S. citizen transfer any funds during their lifetime to a non-US citizen spouse, there may be a reduction in the U.S. citizen spouse’s estate; however, the annual marital gift allowance is reduced from unlimited to an amount of $164,000.00 in 2022.

A Brief Overview of Contrasting International Transfer Tax Regimes

U.S. laws surrounding estate tax can be found in numerous states, with each possessing either similar or different criteria to be met critical differences, especially regarding state taxation and population, such as New York to Illinois. However, these differences are insignificant compared to the rest of the world. Most U.S. states make use of English common law, while other countries may make use of civil law systems. And as of October 2020, less than half of all American states and territories had ratified the International Wills Treaty and adopted the Annex.

Current civil law has been modeled after Roman law, resulting in statutes being longer, more detailed, and with less discretion and interpretive power to the court. 

Common law has more concise constitutions and statutes which afford more discretion and interpretive power to the courts when laws are applied to particular facts and circumstances.

As a common law country, the U.S. allows individuals more control and discretion in terms of distributing their wealth to their heirs. This is done by drafting a legal Will that provides specific instructions for the bequeathing of their wealth using the probate system.

Trusts can be used as vehicles to bypass probate and to avoid/defer estate tax. The estate is typically taxed before the distribution of wealth is made to the heirs. If a valid Will is not in place, state intestacy laws will determine how the decedent’s property should be distributed.

Due to the fundamental differences in common and civil law countries, it is possible for the existing estate plan that the family may have in place to become outdated, ineffective, and perhaps very counter-productive. This is especially the case if the family relocates overseas. 

Concepts of Citizenship, Residency, and Domicile

Along with cross-border taxation and laws, another critical factor in any international estate planning process is how one’s residency, citizenship, or domicile. These concepts have crucial significance in determining the transfer taxes to which the individuals could be exposed.

Expats need to understand any requirements and definitions under the laws of the countries where they live, work, and own assets. The likelihood that the effectiveness of an existing estate plan may deteriorate is dependent on where the family relocates and how much their existing assets integrate into their new country of residence as well. The duration of how long they are in the new jurisdiction is also a component an individual must consider before starting the process.

U.S. tax residency is determined using two tests: The first is the substantial presence test which measures the number of days an individual physically spends in the country. The second is based on the individual’s permanent residency – i.e., as soon as the individual becomes a green card holder, they are deemed to be a U.S. tax resident. Let’s also distinguish that a U.S. citizen is always considered a resident for income tax purposes.

Transfer taxes, however, do not consider the individual’s tax residency. Instead, it will focus on the concept of domicile. Domicile is established by determining the jurisdiction in which an individual resides without the intention of leaving permanently at some time in the future. 

Should the individual meet the requirements to be regarded as a tax resident in the U.S. but does not have the intention to remain in the country permanently, a domicile has not been created. However, once domicile has been established in a country, the only way to sever it would be actually to move outside the country/emigrate. Immigrants may be able to obtain estate tax residency if a green card is obtained and they intend to remain in the U.S. permanently.

 

Asena Advisors focuses on strategic advice that sets us apart from most wealth management businesses. We protect wealth.

Transfer Tax Situs Rules, Tax Treaties, And Foreign Tax Credits

Now that we have gone over general key information and issues to be aware of let’s dive into strategies, credits, and other rules surrounding global taxation for IEP.

Tax Planning Strategies: Cross-Border Pitfalls and Considerations

The transfer tax implications for expats and other non-US person’s property will depend on the following:

    • The character and nature of the assets;
    • The physical location of the assets;
    • Whether there is an estate tax treaty between the country of domicile/citizenship or residence and the U.S.;
    • Whether there are any tax credits available in the U.S. and the relevant jurisdiction should there be an overlapping of any taxes which need to be imposed.
Understanding The Role Of Situs In International Transfer Taxation

As discussed above, situs is the Latin word for “position” or “site.” In legal terminology, it refers to the property’s location.

Federal estate taxes are levied on the worldwide assets of U.S. citizens and residents. For non-residents, the situs rule is that any tangible asset physically located in the U.S. will become subjected to federal estate tax. The rules for intangible property and assets are more complicated. It is possible for an asset to be considered a non-situs asset for U.S. gift taxes but may be considered to be a situs asset for U.S. estate taxes.

The Interplay of Tax Treaties Are Foreign Tax Credits On Cross-Border Estates

The U.S. currently has estate and gift tax treaties with fifteen other jurisdictions. The tax treaties serve important roles when determining the transfer tax consequences of the assets which may form part of the cross-border estate. The treaty may provide a meaningful reduction in estate taxes employing mitigating discriminatory tax treatments and double taxation.

The treaty determines the country of the donor/decedent’s domicile and the country where the property is deemed to be located. Once this determination has been made, the treaty controls which countries can assess transfer taxes.

Some treaties relieve some of the burdens which may occur when a surviving spouse of the estate is non-resident upon the passing of a US-domiciled spouse. This is done by increasing the marital deduction for non-resident spouses. If both countries have claimed to levy estate taxes, a tax credit regime may be in place to at least reduce or eliminate double taxation.

When preparing the international estate plan for clients, the interplay between the relevant transfer tax regime and the relevant treaty. This is to ensure that the impact of domicile and citizenship is also considered in addition to not only the nature of the location and the property. The filer must also specify any benefit which has been claimed under the treaty in their actual tax filings. Otherwise, the presumed benefit may be lost. Unlike the tax treaties, the U.S. does not make any special claims to negate the treaty on the basis of the heir or decedent’s citizenship.

Tie-breaker clauses are key factors in these tax treaties. How the tie-breaker rules operate depends on whether the newer or older situs rules are followed in the estate tax treaties. 

The most recently ratified estate tax treaties follow the rules based on the domicile-based approach. The treaty rules prioritize determining the jurisdiction where the decedent is domiciled. The domiciliary country can tax any and all transfers of property within the estate, while the non-domiciliary country may only tax situs property. Foreign transfer tax credits will then be provided to the non-domiciliary country by the domiciliary country for taxes paid.

The older treaties follow the more elaborate character/nature rules discussed above for non-resident aliens owning U.S. situs assets. The foreign jurisdiction’s situs rules will apply to the portion of the U.S. person’s estate in the foreign country. These treaties are not uniform; some eliminate double taxation better than others. Generally, provision for primary and secondary credits may be applied to reduce any potential double taxation. The non-situs country will grant a primary credit against the tax imposed on the situs country. Secondary credits may be issued where the individual situs laws of the countries determine that the property has situs in both or even neither country. 

Where there is no tax treaty, there is an increase in the probability of double taxation. Foreign transfer tax credits may still be able to provide a form of relief from double tax taxation, and the availability of same in the U.S. will hinge on the following:

  • Is the property situated in a foreign country?
  • Is the property subject to estate/inheritance taxes?; and
  • Does the property form part of the gross estate of the decedent?

U.S. Internal Revenue Code §2014 elaborates on the credit for foreign death taxes. It should also be noted that the potential foreign tax credits could be unavailable by Presidential proclamation if the foreign country does not provide a reciprocal tax credit to U.S. citizens.

Can Non-US Citizens Inherit Property?

Noncitizens are able to inherit property just as citizens can. One common example of special rules can apply to spouses when one of them is a non-US citizen. When the spouse who is set to inherit property from the estate is a non-US citizen, the marital deduction is no longer unlimited, even if the spouse happens to be a permanent U.S. resident. The rationale is to ensure that a non-US citizen does not inherit a large sum of money tax-free and then return to their native land. On the other hand, if the non-US citizen spouse were to pass away first, the assets left to the U.S. citizen would qualify for the unlimited marital deduction.

Just as the marital deduction is not unlimited to a non-U.S. resident spouse, the special tax-free treatment of gifts given to spouses during their lifetime is also subject to a limit of $164,000 annually. The amount is indexed for inflation and is subject to change annually.

Can U.S. Trust Own Foreign Assets?

Yes, it is possible for a U.S. trust to own foreign assets. However, it should be noted that certain countries or jurisdictions do not recognize trusts, which can result in higher taxes when or obstacles when transferring foreign assets. A possible reason is that the country or jurisdiction utilizes a civil law system rather than a common law system, with the latter allowing clients to use trusts for inheritance.

Look into whether the country you wish to engage in international estate planning operates on either a civil law or a common law system before beginning the process. If not, consult with your client or advisor to determine possibilities for you to meet civil law regulations and additional tax laws with little to no room for complications.

What is an International Will?

An International Will is intended to take effect in more than one country or jurisdiction. It can also be referred to as an Offshore Will and specifically deals with assets located in a foreign country or jurisdiction, whether from family, friends, or business-related reasons. Should it be intended for the Will to deal with the individual’s worldwide assets, it may be referred to as a ‘Worldwide Will.’

How an International Will is produced and finalized depends on the country or jurisdiction it originates from, but in many cases, it requires to be handwritten and witnessed by at least two individuals. Most countries with a common law system are accepting of a Will from the United States and vice versa, as well as recognizing if the Will was executed in the United States and vice versa. And with any of these cases, a Will can be written in a language of the writer’s choosing.

Are Foreign Assets Subject to Estate Tax?

Citizens and permanent residents of the U.S. who are domiciled within the U.S. can be subjected to estate tax on their worldwide assets, including any foreign ones they have acquired at any point in time. Should there be a tax treaty with the jurisdiction where the assets are located, this needs to be considered when determining if foreign estate tax credits may be applicable. That way, you can either reduce incoming taxation or to avoid double taxation. Which solution, or another, that may apply to your case must be consulted with professional advisors before moving forward in order to avoid filing with inaccurate information and other legal consequences.

Our consultants can help you with your international estate planning case. Contact us to set up an appointment in the “Have a question?” section to the right.

Jean-dré Tombisa

Peter Harper